> On 04 Jun 2017, at 14:37, Willy Tarreau <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> On Sat, Jun 03, 2017 at 10:36:04AM +0200, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
>> Hi Dmitry Sivachenko,
>> 
>> Dmitry wrote on:
>> 
>>> Hello,
>> 
>>> Right now we have in the Makefile:
>> 
>>> #### Common CFLAGS
>>> # These CFLAGS contain general optimization options, CPU-specific 
>>> optimizations
>>> # and debug flags. They may be overridden by some distributions which 
>>> prefer to
>>> # set all of them at once instead of playing with the CPU and DEBUG 
>>> variables.
>>> CFLAGS = $(ARCH_FLAGS) $(CPU_CFLAGS) $(DEBUG_CFLAGS) $(SPEC_CFLAGS)
>> 
>>> So you explicitly suggest to override CFLAGS if someone want to add
>>> custom options here (say, tune optimisations).
>> 
>>> But this way now mandatory -fwrap will be lost.  Or one must remember not 
>>> to loose it.
>>> This is not convenient.
>> 
>>> I propose to add some means to inherit CFLAGS defined in haproxy's
>>> Makefile, but allow to customise it via additional options passed via 
>>> environment, example attached.
>> 
>>> What do you think?
>> 
>>> (another way would be to add $(CUSTOM_CFLAGS) at the end of CFLAGS 
>>> assignment).
>> 
>> Personally I would prefer the CUSTOM_CFLAGS way.
> 
> Same here, and it's important not to create confusion on the way
> CFLAGS are computed.
> 
> By the way, usually if I need to add some specific flags (eg #define),
> I do it via DEFINE or SMALL_OPTS. If I want to change the optimization
> options, I use CPU_CFLAGS or CPU_CFLAGS.<target_name>.
> 
> So maybe you already have what you need and only the documentation needs
> to be improved.
> 

FreeBSD ports collection has a rule for CFLAGS customisation: ports framework 
sets CFLAGS environment and expects it to be used during compilation.

Usually people use it to specify different -On options and other optimisations 
they want.

So strictly speaking it is not CPU-specific, but rather environment-specific.  
So exactly what comment near CFLAGS is about: "".
Right now I see only -O2 in CPU_CFLAGS, so it can be used for that purpose.

If the consensus will be to use CPU_CFLAGS for my purpose, it's OK, I will 
switch to it.

Thanks.

Reply via email to