2017-09-16 20:01 GMT+05:00 Aleksandar Lazic <[email protected]>:

> Hi Olivie.
>
> Olivier Doucet wrote on 15.09.2017:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I wanted to open a new thread, as "cppcheck finding" was hijacked with
> this CICD / testing ;)
>
> +1
>
> > I think the best is the enemy of the good : why not start with a few
> > easy tests ? For example just a mix of tiny / big config files to test
> the parser.
> >
> > I understand the difficult part of the test is to setup complicated
> > infrastructures with many softwares to test edge cases, but that can be
> done later.
> >
> > Willy, there is no need to setup and maintain a buildfarm (no one has
> > time for this) : as this is an open project, we can use platform like
> > Travis-CI : all tests are described in a yaml file incorporated in the
> > project. It works out of the box for any project hosted at github. We
> can use a mirror for this.
>
> I like the idea.
>
> Does anyone know who own https://github.com/haproxy/haproxy ?
>
> I can start with some easy checks, the question is should we have a git
> hook when a commit is done on http://git.haproxy.org ?
>
> > What is great about these is that you can easily plug syntax check
> softwares ;)
>
> +1 ;-)
>
> > Olivier
>
> --
> Best Regards
> Aleks
>
>
>

Hello,

I made weird thing


https://gitlab.com/chipitsine/haproxy/blob/master/.gitlab-ci.yml


repo itself is merged hourly with upstream repo (by using external syncer)

https://gitlab.com/chipitsine/haproxy/-/jobs

Reply via email to