Hi, 2017-12-14 22:49 GMT+01:00 Willy Tarreau <[email protected]>: > > On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 10:18:27PM +0100, Cyril Bonté wrote: > > Le 14/12/2017 à 19:24, Willy Tarreau a écrit : > > Or maybe "length" then ? After all it could even work on binary samples if > needed, thus avoiding "str" could avoid some confusion. Etienne, feel free > to suggest as well, you're the first user :-)
I agree that my first intent "strlen" is not coherent with the other converter name. "length" is better in the logic of the name of other converters. -- Etienne
