Hi Olivier, On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 04:35:35PM +0100, Olivier Houchard wrote: > Hi, > > The attached patch attempts to map SRV record weight to haproxy weight > correctly, > SRV weight goes from 0 to 65536 while haproxy uses 0 to 256, so we have to > divide it by 256, and a SRV weight of 0 doesn't mean the server shouldn't be > used, so we use a minimum weight of 1.
>From what I'm seeing in the code, it's 0..65535 for the SRV record. And that allows us to simplify it and use the full range of the weight like this : hap_weight = srv_weight / 256 + 1; => 0..255 return 1 1..511 return 2 ... 65280..65535 return 256 What do you think ? Willy
