On 17/01/2018 15:56, Olivier Houchard wrote: > >> So, as a conclusion, I'm just not sure that producing this warning is >> relevant in case the IP is duplicated for several servers *if they are >> disabled*... > Or maybe we should just advocate using 0.0.0.0 when we mean "no IP" :) Not sure about that, 0.0.0.0 is not valid in the config in this case but it is in some others (thinking about "bind" for ex.)
Advertising it can be a bit confusing. > It would be a bit painful, though doable, to don't check if the server is > disabled, but to add the check when server is enabled. I don't know if > it's worth it. > To me this would be the best (functionally speaking, don't know about the performances aspects :) ), since in the context of cookies, you probably doing it wrong if you enable 2 servers with the same IP. But server-templates are a good use-case in which you want to be able to do what you want with disabled servers. To be discussed with people on your side ? we can clearly live with both options. Pierre
