On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 05:29:21PM +0100, Mateusz Malek wrote:
> On 13.02.2018 15:27, Olivier Houchard wrote:
> > Thanks a lot for the detailed analyze, and sorry for the late answer.
> > You're probably right, SSL_ERROR_SYSCALL shouldn't be treated as an
> > unrecoverable error.
> > So, what you basically did was something equivalent to the patch attached ?
> Yeah, it looked exactly like this ;) I'm glad I could help.
So does this mean I should take the patch as is ? Please just let me know.