Hello Moemen Thank you for your reply.
Indeed we have already thought of the MAXCONN values. Any other thoughts? The aim is to move clients from a failed server slowly much like the feature where a real server comes back online and slowly the weight is raised until all connections are on the working real server. Andruw Smalley Loadbalancer.org Ltd. www.loadbalancer.org +1 888 867 9504 / +44 (0)330 380 1064 [email protected] Leave a Review | Deployment Guides | Blog On 13 February 2018 at 17:21, Moemen MHEDHBI <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 13/02/2018 15:49, Andrew Smalley wrote: >> Hi, > Hi Andrew, > >> >> We have had a request and not sure if there is any way to implement this. >> >> Simply think of two real servers being loadbalanced. one fails all the >> connections are moved to the remaining server overloading it. >> >> What we want is for the traffic from the failed real server to be >> moved to the remaining real server without overloading it. IE Move a >> few connections at a time so the last server is not overloaded. >> >> Anyone know how this can be done? > > Setting the right maxconn value for the server would not be sufficient > here ? So the extra traffic due to the failed server will be queued. > > >> >> >> Andruw Smalley >> >> Loadbalancer.org Ltd. >> >> www.loadbalancer.org >> +1 888 867 9504 / +44 (0)330 380 1064 >> [email protected] >> >> Leave a Review | Deployment Guides | Blog >> > > -- > Moemen MHEDHBI > >
