On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 01:43:41PM +0100, Jonathan Matthews wrote:
> Improvements and suggestions welcome; flames and horror -> /dev/null ;-)

Would anyone be interested in adding two new converters for this,
working exactly like base64/b64dec but with the URL-compatible
base64 encoding instead ? We could call them :


Note that it can be a nice and useful exercise for a first-time contribution,
don't be ashamed guys!


Reply via email to