2018-06-14 11:14 GMT+02:00 Willy Tarreau <[email protected]>:
> Yep it's really not easy and probably once we find it I'll be ashamed
> saying "I thought this code was not merged"... By the way yesterday I
> found another suspect but I'm undecided on it ; the current architecture
> of the H2 mux complicates the code analysis. If you want to give it a
> try on top of previous one, I'd appreciate it, even if it doesn't change
> anything. Please find it attached.

Will try.

I've found one more clue. I've added various graphs to my monitoring.
Also I've been segregating various traffic kinds into different
haproxy backends. Yesterday test shows this:
https://pasteboard.co/HpPK2Ml6.png

This backend (sns) is used exclusively for static files that are
"large" (from 10KB up to over a megabyte) compared to my usual traffic
(various API calls mostly). Those 5xx errors are not from the backend
servers, "show stat":
sns,kr-8,0,0,5,108,,186655,191829829,19744924356,,0,,0,0,0,0,UP,100,1,0,0,0,15377,0,,1,4,1,,186655,,2,7,,147,L7OK,200,1,0,184295,550,0,0,0,,,,,8895,0,,,,,0,OK,,0,12,4,1474826,,,,Layer7
check passed,,2,5,6,,,,10.7.1.8:81,,http,,,,,,,,
sns,kr-10,0,0,2,105,,186654,191649821,19977086644,,0,,0,0,0,0,UP,100,1,0,0,0,15377,0,,1,4,2,,186654,,2,7,,148,L7OK,200,0,0,184275,551,0,0,0,,,,,8823,0,,,,,0,OK,,0,21,4,1473385,,,,Layer7
check passed,,2,5,6,,,,10.7.1.10:81,,http,,,,,,,,
sns,BACKEND,0,0,8,213,6554,383553,391967657,39722011000,0,0,,0,0,0,0,UP,200,2,0,,0,15377,0,,1,4,0,,373309,,1,14,,332,,,,0,368563,1101,0,1873,12008,,,,383545,27962,0,0,0,0,0,0,,,0,18,5,1763433,,,,,,,,,,,,,,http,roundrobin,,,,,,,

-- 
Janusz Dziemidowicz

Reply via email to