On Sun, Jun 24, 2018 at 10:05:48AM +0000, Zero King wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 24, 2018 at 11:45:35AM +0200, William Lallemand wrote:
> >On Sun, Jun 24, 2018 at 09:35:11AM +0000, Zero King wrote:
> >> On Sun, Jun 24, 2018 at 09:42:54AM +0200, William Lallemand wrote:
> >> >On Sun, Jun 24, 2018 at 02:30:57AM +0000, Zero King wrote:
> >> >> Hi,
> >> >>
> >> >> I tried to update haproxy to 1.8.10 in MacPorts, but it fails to build
> >> >> from source with the following error (without USE_THREAD):
> >> >>
> >> >> /usr/bin/clang -arch x86_64 -Iinclude -Iebtree -Wall  -O2 -g 
> >> >> -fno-strict-aliasing -Wdeclaration-after-statement -fwrapv 
> >> >> -fno-strict-overflow  -Wno-address-of-packed-member 
> >> >> -Wno-null-dereference -Wno-unused-label       -DTPROXY 
> >> >> -DCONFIG_HAP_CRYPT -DUSE_ZLIB  -DENABLE_POLL -DENABLE_KQUEUE 
> >> >> -DCONFIG_REGPARM=3 -DUSE_OPENSSL  -DUSE_PCRE -I/opt/local/include  
> >> >> -DCONFIG_HAPROXY_VERSION=\"1.8.10-ec17d7a\" 
> >> >> -DCONFIG_HAPROXY_DATE=\"2018/06/22\" -c -o src/log.o src/log.c
> >> >> src/haproxy.c:2475:16: error: cannot take the address of an rvalue of 
> >> >> type 'unsigned long'
> >> >>         HA_ATOMIC_AND(&all_threads_mask, ~tid_bit);
> >> >>                       ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >> >> include/common/hathreads.h:41:42: note: expanded from macro 
> >> >> 'HA_ATOMIC_AND'
> >> >> #define HA_ATOMIC_AND(val, flags)    ({*(val) &= (flags);})
> >> >>                                          ^~~
> >> >> 1 error generated.
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >Thanks for your report, there a patch that should solve this issue.
> >>
> >> Thanks for the patch, I applied it in OS X < 10.7 [1], which doesn't
> >> support USE_THREAD, and build passed.
> >>
> >> [1]: 
> >> https://github.com/macports/macports-ports/commit/a8f179575f70f0d21dfbaef7a9003cbcb43b59bb
> >>
> >
> >I don't own an OS X machine so that's difficult for me to test, but what is 
> >the
> >reason USE_THREAD is not supported in < 10.7?
> 
> Lack of thread-local storage support, see 
> https://github.com/macports/macports-ports/commit/35ea8581e16eb3cc92f03ec6bc3f21959d0a44e4#diff-ded0796a87dca23e1462f6820eaaa86dR245.
> I don't have an old system myself so I went for the easy way and
> disabled threads.
> 
> /usr/bin/gcc-4.2 -arch x86_64 -Iinclude -Iebtree -Wall  -O2 -g 
> -fno-strict-aliasing -Wdeclaration-after-statement -fwrapv 
> -fno-strict-overflow    -Wno-unused-label       -DTPROXY -DCONFIG_HAP_CRYPT 
> -DUSE_ZLIB  -DENABLE_POLL -DENABLE_KQUEUE -DCONFIG_REGPARM=3 -DUSE_THREAD 
> -DUSE_OPENSSL  -DUSE_PCRE -I/opt/local/include  
> -DCONFIG_HAPROXY_VERSION=\"1.8.10-ec17d7a\" 
> -DCONFIG_HAPROXY_DATE=\"2018/06/22\" -c -o ebtree/ebmbtree.o ebtree/ebmbtree.c
> In file included from include/common/memory.h:32,
>                  from include/common/chunk.h:29,
>                  from include/common/standard.h:36,
>                  from include/common/ticks.h:56,
>                  from src/ev_kqueue.c:22:
> include/common/hathreads.h:28: error: thread-local storage not supported for 
> this target
> include/common/hathreads.h:29: error: thread-local storage not supported for 
> this target
> In file included from include/common/memory.h:32,
>                  from include/common/chunk.h:29,
>                  from include/common/standard.h:36,
>                  from include/common/ticks.h:56,
>                  from src/ev_poll.c:22:
> include/common/hathreads.h:28: error: thread-local storage not supported for 
> this target
> include/common/hathreads.h:29: error: thread-local storage not supported for 
> this target
> In file included from include/common/ticks.h:56,
>                  from src/ev_kqueue.c:22:
> include/common/standard.h:96: error: thread-local storage not supported for 
> this target
> include/common/standard.h:111: error: thread-local storage not supported for 
> this target
> In file included from include/common/ticks.h:56,
>                  from src/ev_poll.c:22:
> include/common/standard.h:96: error: thread-local storage not supported for 
> this target
> include/common/standard.h:111: error: thread-local storage not supported for 
> this target
> 

Thanks for the informations, you can build directly the 1.8.11 version which
includes that patch now :-)

-- 
William Lallemand

Reply via email to