On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 04:30:38PM +0200, Tim Düsterhus wrote: > Willy, > > Am 26.06.2018 um 16:24 schrieb Willy Tarreau: > > I *think* your patch is OK. I just hate having multiple exit points when > > refcounts are involved, we're pretty sure that in a future version we'll > > As we sent almost at the same time: I intentionally wrote it with the > new return, instead of moving it into the if, because it looks more like > sample_conv_table_conn_cur that way (see my other email).
OK you're right, then let's keep it like this. Thank you Tim! Willy
