Thanks, I'll check it out. ср, 11 июл. 2018 г. в 18:20, Frederic Lecaille <flecai...@haproxy.com>:
> On 07/11/2018 10:41 AM, Frederic Lecaille wrote: > > On 07/10/2018 01:35 PM, Илья Шипицин wrote: > >> Hello, > > > > Hello Ilya, > > > >> I had an idea, what if we will run reg-tests with various sanitizers ? > >> > >> for example, > >> > >> https://gitlab.com/chipitsine/haproxy/-/jobs/80667862 > >> > >> (gcc + sanitize-address). > >> can someone confirm a bug there ? > > > > I confirm there is a little bug, but without any consequence (only a > > memleak). In fact the address sanitizer detects that the loggin buffers > > are allocated twice by the main thread. > > So in fact there is no bug (see Christopher answer: > https://www.mail-archive.com/haproxy@formilux.org/msg30622.html). > > After googling, it seems that libasan may produce false positives. > > You must not use it to run reg tests. > > Fred. >
