Trying to configure mod security on HA Proxy server with the following way. However, it throws error.
https://fossies.org/linux/haproxy/contrib/modsecurity/README ./modsecurity.h -h ./modsecurity.h: line 1: /bin: Is a directory ./modsecurity.h: line 2: acmp.h: command not found ./modsecurity.h: line 3: syntax error near unexpected token `(' ./modsecurity.h: line 3: `* Copyright (c) 2004-2013 Trustwave Holdings, Inc. (http://www.trustwave.com/)' On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 2:58 AM, Mark Lakes <mla...@signalsciences.com> wrote: > Thank you for the feedback, although this is in fact a technical solution > I never intended to offend anyone. I have submitted fixes to haproxy in the > past but have not as you say responded to questions before this. > > thanks again for the feedback > -mark > > > > > > On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 2:03 PM, Willy Tarreau <w...@1wt.eu> wrote: > >> Mark, >> >> On Wed, May 09, 2018 at 10:40:38AM -0700, Mark Lakes wrote: >> > For commercial purposes, see Signal Sciences Next Gen WAF solution: >> > https://www.signalsciences.com/waf-web-application-firewall/ >> >> Advertising for commercial products on an open source list is never >> welcome >> especially when such a response looks like it's made only to try to place >> a >> product and nor really to propose a technical solution (and it's not as if >> you had ever responded to a question here prior to this one). >> >> A large number of commercial product vendors are represented here, some of >> whom invest a lot in R&D and support, some even competing in certain >> areas, >> and all of them respect this basic rule, focusing only on sharing >> knowledge >> and improvements to haproxy. A few times I've even rejected requests from >> some of my coworkers who asked if it was OK to respond to someone with a >> link to one of HapTech's commercial solutions and I'm pretty sure others >> do the same in other companies. >> >> Given the complaints we used to have in the past with the spams on the >> list, >> I'm pretty sure that most of the list's participants would prefer that the >> list remains free of any form of advertising so that we can continue to >> work >> all together without being polluted nor starting to suspect that each >> proposal >> or question would derive to another ad. >> >> Also, I'm normally not the one who'd comment on each other's signature, >> but >> this one occupies almost half of my 80x24 response e-mail window, full of >> links and even trackers as if you were trying hard to make a bit of SEO, >> and this is quite impolite to many users, so I think it would be >> reasonable >> to significantly trim it down : >> >> > *Mark Lakes* >> > Sr Software Engineer >> > (555) 555-5555 >> > <https://www.signalsciences.com/?utm_source=emailsig> >> > Winner: InfoWorld Technology of the Year 2018 >> > <https://www.infoworld.com/article/3251828/application-devel >> opment/infoworlds-2018-technology-of-the-year-award-winners.html#slide24> >> > <https://www.facebook.com/SignalSciences/> >> > <https://twitter.com/signalsciences> >> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/signal-sciences/> >> >> You will simply not find this from most of the regular participants on >> this >> list and many would probably like to take the opportunity as well but >> refrain >> from doing so to respect others. So at least being the only one to post >> like >> this should give you a hint how to proceed in the future. >> >> Thanks, >> Willy >> > > -- Thanks & Regards Dhaval Jaiswal
