Hi Fred!

On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 10:59:43AM +0200, Frederic Lecaille wrote:
> Well, after having checked, haproxy could start with a cache bigger than 
> 2047 MB on my PC due to parsing issue.
> 
> I provide three patches. The first fixes the "total-max-size" parsing 
> issue. The second patch is there to also parse "max-object-size" as an 
> unsigned int to avoid weird issues (implicit conversions). The last if 
> for the documentation update.
> 
> Note that the maximum value of "max-object-size" is 4095/2 MB which may 
> be stored as an int.
> 

Good catch!

Could you split the patches which contains shctx changes? Changes in the shctx
API should have their own patches.

You last patch seems to contain several fixes, 1 on the cache configuration
parsing, and 2 others related to the way we test shctx_init. We mustn't have
patches on ssl_sock.c in a patch related to the cache.

Thanks.

-- 
William Lallemand

Reply via email to