After the weekend, the test machine looks fine. Thanks!

-- 
  Richard Russo
  [email protected]

On Fri, Apr 12, 2019, at 10:33 AM, Richard Russo wrote:
> Thank you; I had missed the context from 1.9.6.  I've updated my test 
> machine and will report back on Monday (or earlier, if it runs into 
> trouble)
> 
> -- 
>   Richard Russo
>   [email protected]
> 
> On Fri, Apr 12, 2019, at 4:17 AM, Olivier Houchard wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 08:37:10AM +0200, Maciej Zdeb wrote:
> > > Hi Richard,
> > > 
> > > Those patches from Olivier (in streams) are related to my report from
> > > thread "[1.9.6] One of haproxy processes using 100% CPU", but as it turned
> > > out it wasn't a single bug and issue is not entirely fixed yet.
> > > 
> > > Currently I'm testing some additional patches from Olivier which hopefully
> > > fix the issue definitely.
> > > 
> > 
> > Indeed, the rmoeval of SI_FL_ERR in si_update_both() was bogus, and covered
> > misuses of it.
> > With the great help of Maciej, we investigated this, and I just pushed what
> > we fixed so far. Richard, I'd be really interested in knowing if you still
> > have issues with the latest master.
> > 
> > Thanks !
> > 
> > Olivier
> > 
> > > pt., 12 kwi 2019 o 00:01 Richard Russo <[email protected]> napisaƂ(a):
> > > 
> > > > It seems that after applying 39cc020af, if a stream gets the SI_FL_ERR
> > > > flag, process_stream can keep going back to redo around stream.c:line 
> > > > 2503:
> > > >
> > > > if (si_f->state == SI_ST_DIS || si_f->state != si_f_prev_state ||
> > > >     si_b->state == SI_ST_DIS || si_b->state != si_b_prev_state ||
> > > >     ((si_f->flags | si_b->flags) & SI_FL_ERR) ||
> > > >     (((req->flags ^ rqf_last) | (res->flags ^ rpf_last)) &
> > > > CF_MASK_ANALYSER))
> > > >          goto redo;
> > > >
> > > > Now that si_update_both no longer clears the SI_FL_ERR flag, and nothing
> > > > else does, the goto will get called forever. I don't understand this
> > > > section enough to try to reproduce this, but I found several processes
> > > > stuck here on a machine testing from yesterday's HEAD.
> > > >
> > > > Richard
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > >   Richard Russo
> > > >   [email protected]
> > > >
> > > >
> >
> 
>

Reply via email to