чт, 23 мая 2019 г. в 14:03, Willy Tarreau <w...@1wt.eu>:
> On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 07:15:21PM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > On Wed, May 22, 2019 at 03:24:25PM +0500, ???? ??????? wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > someone is reviewing this
> https://github.com/haproxy/haproxy/runs/133866993
> > > ?
> >
> > So apparently we don't have _POSIX_C_SOURCE >= 199309L there, which
> > contradicts the promise in my linux man pages :-/ The docs on opengroup
> > do not mention this define but indicate that the extension was derived
> > from another spec. I'm going to remove the version test, as I think that
> > the POSIX_TIMERS will not be set anyway in this case. We'll see if it
> > breaks anywhere else.
>
> I could build haproxy on a FreeBSD 11.1 machine. I had other issues to
> fix, but I didn't get the error on clock_gettime(). I'm not sure how
> it can happen since the defines would need to be incompatible between
> two files. I'm not even certain it's running on the last source, I can't
> find how to navigate between the builds on their interface.
>
I'll have a look.
probably we'll add freebsd 11 to cirrus matrix
>
> For now I've addressed the issues which will lead to a failure with
> timerfd_{create,settime,delete}() that I detected here in my VM. We'll
> see if Cirrus =' status changes. Once it works we could try again with
> USE_RT on FreeBSD, but well, one thing at a time :-)
>
> Cheers,
> Willy
>
