Hi Aleks,

On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 01:12:48PM +0200, Aleksandar Lazic wrote:
> We had a interesting discussion on Kubeconf how a session table in peer's can
> survive a restart of a haproxy instance.
> We came to a request for enhancement (RFE) to be able to add a peer server,
> not a peer section, to a existing peers section, similar to add server for
> backend.

It's not entirely clear to me in which case it would be useful. Do you
need to deploy new haproxy nodes on the fly and to avoid restarting the
other ones to see it as a peer maybe ?

Thanks to the changes Fred did which made the peers become totally regular
servers, I suspect it wouldn't be too hard to make the server-template
mechanism work the same way for peers. It's just that I'm not sure about
the expected benefits.


Reply via email to