Hi William,

On Sat, Dec 28, 2019 at 03:36:02PM +0100, William Dauchy wrote:
> in the context of seamless reload and busy polling, older processes will
> create unecessary cpu conflicts; we can assume there is no need for busy
> polling for old processes which are waiting to be terminated.
> This patch is not a bug fix itself but might be a good stability
> improvment when you are un the context of frequent seamless reloads with
> a high "hard-stop-after" value; for that reasons I think this patch
> should be backported in all 2.x versions.

This totally makes sense, thanks for doing this! I guess this shows
that few people use busy polling for now ;-)

Now applied, thanks!

Reply via email to