Hi William, On Sat, Dec 28, 2019 at 03:36:02PM +0100, William Dauchy wrote: > in the context of seamless reload and busy polling, older processes will > create unecessary cpu conflicts; we can assume there is no need for busy > polling for old processes which are waiting to be terminated. > > This patch is not a bug fix itself but might be a good stability > improvment when you are un the context of frequent seamless reloads with > a high "hard-stop-after" value; for that reasons I think this patch > should be backported in all 2.x versions.
This totally makes sense, thanks for doing this! I guess this shows that few people use busy polling for now ;-) Now applied, thanks! Willy