Hello,
+1 for this feature I have some rspidel and rspirep waiting to be migrated to 2.2 when this feature will be available. Thanks, El vie, 14-02-2020 a las 09:59 +0100, Willy Tarreau escribió: > Hi James, > > On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 12:44:24PM -0800, James Brown wrote: > > So how should we move this proposal forward? I'm glad to contribute > > more > > patches... > > Sorry for the very late response, we needed to discuss this with > Christopher then both got busy and then forgot :-/ > > So after discussion, we both agreed that it makes sense to implement > it > following the same model as the ACLs described below : > > > > A variant of this could be to use the same syntax as the options > > > we already > > > use on ACL matches, which are "-m reg", "-m beg", "-m end". But > > > these will > > > also need to be placed after to avoid the same ambiguity (since > > > "-m" is a > > > token hence a valid header name). That would give for example : > > > > > > http-request del-header server > > > http-request del-header x-private- -m beg > > > http-request del-header x-.*company -m reg > > > http-request del-header -tracea -m end > > However, do not feel pressured to implement all matching methods! The > currently known ones are described in section 7.1 of the doc, I think > that "str", "reg", "sub", "beg" and "end" are the only ones which > would > make sense over the long term. In practice we could have "str" being > the current one and "beg" being the one with the prefix as you need. > If later others need more modes we can implement them (unless you > want > to provide them all at once of course). > > Thanks for whatever you can do in this area and sorry again for > responding late! > > Willy >
