On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 01:23:44PM +0100, William Lallemand wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 01:17:09PM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > It's really annoying to have to constantly commits into the project
> > just to experiment with random fixes there. The problem could very
> > well be in the build-ssl script but it's hard to tell. I was thinking
> > about disabling this entry for now because it's a pain to constantly
> > see the build status in red while it's only the SSL build which fails,
> > something that's out of our scope.
> > 
> 
> Well, maybe we could have a temporary branch to run the reg-tests then
> merge this branch once the reg-tests pass. That's what CI guys does
> generally.
> 
> Or people could just run the CI on their own fork before submitting the
> patches, but I don't know how complex this is, and we will need some doc
> if we doc that.
> 

Actually I think it's possible to run the CI on the pull requests :-)

-- 
William Lallemand

Reply via email to