Am 19.03.20 um 15:55 schrieb Willy Tarreau:
> Actually I'm pretty sure that I did it this way precisely for performance
> reasons: avoid repeatedly checking a pointer for half of the headers which
> are pseudo headers (method, scheme, authority, path just for the request).
> It's perfectly possible that the difference is negligible though, but if
> it's not, I'm sorry but I'll favor performance over static analysers'
> own pleasure. So this one will definitely deserve a test.

Yes, the performance <-> static analyzer trade-off not preferring the
static analyzers is acceptable to me.

Best regards
Tim Düsterhus

Reply via email to