On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 02:38:28PM +0500, ???? ??????? wrote: > hmm. > > seems, we need some musl or picolibc in CI. > beeing glibc dependent is dangerous
It's not really glibc-dependent in that it's properly enclosed in ifdefs. But you'd be welcome to add musl if you find an easy way to do it. Please just avoid building a toolchain and musl on the fly for this, as this would eat a huge amount of resources on the CI infrastructure :-/ FWIW musl seems to work OK here when building for linux-glibc-legacy. Cheers, Willy
