сб, 9 мая 2020 г. в 11:45, Willy Tarreau <w...@1wt.eu>:

> On Sat, May 09, 2020 at 08:11:27AM +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> >  ?  8 mai 2020 14:25 +02, Willy Tarreau:
> >
> > >> > Let's increase the timeout to see if it has a chance to finish, no ?
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >> yes
> > >
> > > OK now pushed. It's really annoying to work blindly like this. The
> > > build model Travis uses is broken by design. Requiring to commit
> > > something for testing is utterly wrong. And doing so within the
> > > project that's supposed to being test is further wrong. We already
> > > have 44 patches only on .travis.yml! If this continues like this,
> > > I predict that a "pre-CI" solution will appear to test if your
> > > change is likely to trigger a travis error before it gets merged...
> >
> > You can push changes to a (throwable) branch instead.
>
> Good point, that can also be a solution. But it remains completely
> hackish. It's basically abusing a versioning system to use it as a
> messaging system to indicate "please build with this".
>
> Willy
>


I created several topics (no answer yet).

as for travis-ci rights, it's totally undocumented. but I suspect travis
grants
rights based on github rights. i.e. github admin becomes travis admin as
well.

https://travis-ci.community/t/arm64-fails-with-non-clear-reason/8529

https://travis-ci.community/t/undocumented-require-admin-permissions/8530

https://travis-ci.community/t/undocumented-operation-requires-create-request-access-to-repository/8528

Reply via email to