On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 12:13 PM William Dauchy <wdau...@gmail.com> wrote: > it seems like I broke something with this commit, but I did not have > it in v2.2
small followup: Sorry for that one, the backport was not exactly as I thought, and so no test were done before release outside of 2.2 branch: - a small mistake in index within a loop - more importantly, srv->idle_conns and srv->safe_conns are not thread-safe list in 2.0 and 2.1 I choose to revert the changes < 2.2 -- William
