Hello, On Mon, 22 Jun 2020 at 18:16, Tim Duesterhus <t...@bastelstu.be> wrote: > > Fix parsing of configurations if the configuration file does not end with > an LF.
... but it's also warning about it at the same time. So it's unclear to me: Do we support a configuration without trailing LF or not? If yes, there is no point in a warning (just as < 2.1). If no, we should abort and error out. We can "just warn" if we plan to deprecate it in future release, and at that point, explain that fact. But I find it strange to warn about something, without a clear indication about *WHY* (unsupported, deprecated, etc). Thoughts? --lukas
