On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 02:32:02PM +0500, ???? ??????? wrote: > > Probably we should proceed differently and have something like these > > for the cases where no return is desired: > > > > fcntl_noret() => unchecked fcntl() > > setsockopt_noret() => unchecked setsockopt() > > > > Both would be just static inline functions wrapping the other ones in a > > DISGUISE() if needed. > > > > Then we could change the calls above to be more explicit about the intent > > of not having a return, and less ugly to read. > > > > Do you want to try to do something like this ? > > > > those issues are not urgent. > I will try.
Thank you. Do not hesitate to ask if you need help or if some parts are not clear yet. Cheers, Willy
