On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 05:30:49PM +0100, David CARLIER wrote: > In fact the jit match does less check than the normal match and fits > better when the regex code had been compiled with JIT. However the > classic match call still works with JIT only it does more checks.
OK! did you observe any gain in doing so ? Because we're replacing a direct call with an indirect one. I know it's a detail, but if we're just replacing a few "if" inside pcre_match() with an indirect call, it might easily be on tie! Willy
