On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 05:51:31PM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote: > On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 05:21:34PM +0200, William Lallemand wrote: > > Also, when reading the RFC about the 304, I notice that they impose to > > remove some of the entity headers in the case of the weak etag, so the > > output is not exactly the same as the HEAD. > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2616#section-10.3.5 > > Warning, 2616 is totally outdated and must really die. Please use 7234 > for caching, 7231 for semantics and 7230 for messaging. > > Willy
Sorry, I checked on 7230, but somehow I pasted the wrong one :-) Thanks, -- William Lallemand
