On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 04:55:45PM +0200, Tim Düsterhus, WoltLab GmbH wrote: > I consider 'iif' a bit obscure. It easily looks like a typo. Similar to > 'iff' for 'if and only if' which tends to generate a number of questions > as well.
I agree but others possibly know it and we should not consider our own case as representative, so let's see. > But I've certainly seen 'iif' being used before and I don't strongly > care for the naming. I'm happy with anything. > > I've attached an updated patch and leave it up to you whether you want > to merge it and whether you'd like to wait for more opinions or not :-) I've just merged it so that it gets better exposure, that's the best way to receive criticisms and proposals for another name :-) Thanks! Willy
