Hi Tim,

On Sun, Jan 10, 2021 at 04:37:16PM +0100, Tim Düsterhus wrote:
> as of right now feature requests make up almost half of the open issues
> in the issue tracker (102 / 226). When looking through them I'm seeing a
> few that are probably not going to be implemented any time soon (if ever).

Yes, I noticed this as well.

(...)
> Maybe it makes sense to look through the list of currently open feature
> requests and close the ones that are very unlikely to be implemented (or
> unlikely to be implemented in the next few years) to clean up the
> tracker a bit.

Probably that we should indeed do something like that. But once closed
they're harder to find, so maybe we could proceed by adding a page in
the wiki with a few links:
  - opened feature requests (not handled yet)
  - opened feature requests (in progress)
  - closed feature requests (implemented)
  - closed feature requests (not implemented or differently)

And we'd simply tag "fixed" the ones implemented as desired. For the
not-yet vs wip I don't see any currently valid label, which also makes
me think that we could *possibly* benefit from an "in progress" which
is valid both for bugs and features. However one could argue that an
issue without a status label would imply it's in progress, which would
then suggest that we'd need to add a "status: triage" to new features
just like new bugs.

Just my two cents, ideas welcome of course!
Willy

Reply via email to