Can you provide wireshark capture? It is very useful

On Wed, Feb 3, 2021, 5:39 PM Johan Andersson <[email protected]> wrote:

> To whom it may concern
>
>
>
> We have recently upgraded out HAProxy version from 2.1.3 to 2.2.4.
>
> After the upgrade we got customer complaints that the data usage of their
> devices had gone up. Our company sells proprietary hardware that logs data
> and sends that to a web service which we host. These devices are often
> deployed remotely and connected via shaky 3G connections with data-capped
> SIM cards, so low data usage is very important.
>
> After some digging with Wireshark, we found that the SSL sessions are not
> resumed. Instead a new handshake is initiated every time the device sends
> data. Which is typically once an hour.
>
> We have set the global tune.ssl.lifetime parameter to 24h and the
> tune.ssl.cachesize to 100000 and this has worked since HAProxy version
> 1.6.9 when we first introduced it.
>
> We have also tested with the latest 2.1.11 release of HAProxy and it
> behaves the same way as the 2.1.3 version. We have also tested with 2.2.0
> and 2.2.8 and they behave the same as 2.2.4.
>
>
>
> We have tried reproducing this with openssl s_client, saving the session
> id between requests but can’t reproduce it that way.
>
> We have also pored over the change logs between versions to see if there
> is some change that could make HAProxy behave this way.
>
>
>
> We’re at a loss here, what could cause this behavior, and how can we fix
> it?
>
>
>
>
>
> *Best regards*
>
>
>
> *Johan Andersson*
>
> *Development Engineer*
>
> *Global Platforms Cloud Team*
>
>
>
> HMS Industrial Networks AB
>
> Stationsgatan 37, Box 4126
>
> 300 04 Halmstad, Sweden
>
>
>
> Email: [email protected]
>
>
>
>
>
> HALMSTAD | BARCELONA |  BEIJING | BOSTON | BUCHEN | CHICAGO | COVENTRY |
> DEN BOSCH | DUBAI | IGUALADA |
>
> KARLSRUHE | MILAN | MULHOUSE | NIVELLES | PUNE | RAVENSBURG | SEOUL |
> SINGAPORE | TOKYO | WETZLAR
>
>
>

Reply via email to