Lukas Tribus wrote: [dd]
> > > It would be nice however to understand minconn/fullconn too. If a > > backend has several servers with identical minconn, maxconn and weight, > > what's the point of having minconn? The load will be always distributed > > evenly between all the servers notwithstanding minconn/fullconn, > > correct? > > If the load is REALLY the same, sure. That's just never the case in > real life for a number of reasons: > > - different load-balancing algorithms > - different client behavior > - session persistence > - long-running TCP connections (websocket, et all) Oh, that was the missing link to understand the thing. > > But yes, like I already mentioned, minconn/fullconn is addressing a > very specific requirement that I don't think comes up very often. Thank you Lukas, you have been very helpful. -- Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN 2:5005/49@fidonet http://vas.tomsk.ru/
