On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 04:44:38PM +0200, Moemen MHEDHBI wrote: > > But then how about having just *your* functions > > without relying on the other ones ? Now that you've extended the existing > > function, you can declare it yours, remove all the configurable stuff and > > keep the simplified version as the one you need. I'm sure it will be the > > best tradeoff overall. > > > > Yes that makes sense to me too, the attached patch deal with it as > suggested.
Yeah much cleaner now, indeed. I've merged it, thank you! Willy
