On Mon, Nov 08, 2021 at 02:31:32PM +0100, William Dauchy wrote: > On Mon, Nov 8, 2021 at 1:52 PM Willy Tarreau <[email protected]> wrote: > > Just to be sure, is this something you want to merge into 2.5 or is it > > to be queued next ? I'm fine with both, but I prefer to ask as it's not > > just a one-liner and I don't know the impact on promex. > > I know Christopher was possibly thinking about a more advanced > implementation but I thought it could be ok for a first version. > Probably a good idea to wait for Christopher feedbacks anyway. > I was indeed targeting a late v2.5, despite being a new thing. Sorry > for that and I forgot to add a message about it. > If it works well enough, I will also probably ask for a backport in > 2.4 before the end of the year as I know large clusters are waiting > for this patch to lower their memory consumption in prometheus.
OK, thanks for the details. Then we'll just add a hint about the possibilty of a backport to the commit message, as keeping track of the original author's intent is often useful. Thanks, Willy
