On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 10:02 AM Christopher Faulet <cfau...@haproxy.com> wrote: > I don't know what is the expected behavior on the stable releases for users. > Honestly, I've misread you patch and kept in mind you alternative solution... > But as said, if there is no implicit change (and I'm fine with this > solution), a > new command or an option to current ones must be introduced to be able to > change > SSL setting for health-check too. Otherwise, it will be unusable.
my approach was to say: - remove the implicit behavior - then work on the missing commands for the health checks -- William
