Hi, I found this one and it was totally my own fault. I somehow had a custom systemd unit file lying aroung in /etc/systemd/system/haproxy.service. Most likely I tested something years ago ande never removed it.
Regards, Sander December 3, 2024 at 1:32 PM, "Sander Klein" <roe...@roedie.nl mailto:roe...@roedie.nl?to=%22Sander%20Klein%22%20%3Croedie%40roedie.nl%3E > wrote: > > Hi, > (forgot to send this to the list as well) > > I indeed tried restarting HAProxy as well. But it doesn't matter. It just > doesn't start without error. > > Regards, > > Sander > > December 3, 2024 at 10:41 AM, "Aleksandar Lazic" <al-hapr...@none.at > mailto:al-hapr...@none.at?to=%22Aleksandar%20Lazic%22%20%3Cal-haproxy%40none.at%3E > > wrote: > > > > > Hi. > > > > On 2024-12-03 (Di.) 10:03, Sander Klein wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I've tried upgrading from HAProxy 3.0.6 to 3.1.0. On my primary active > > > loadbalancer this succeeds, but on my back-up load balancer HAProxy will > > > not > > > start. Moreover, it fails silently without logging anything. > > > > > > The config on both loadbalancers is the same except for the backup > > > having no > > > active VRRP IP's ofcourse. When starting HAProxy in debug mode it just > > > starts > > > without problem, Checking the config gives no errors, but HAProxy > > > behaves 'odd'. > > > When I run haproxy -c -V -f /path/to/config I first return to the prompt > > > and > > > then get the output of the check. Like this: > > > > > > root@lb01-b:~# mailto:root@lb01-b:~# haproxy -c -V -f > > > /etc/haproxy/conf.d/ > > > root@lb01-b:~# mailto:root@lb01-b:~# Configuration file is valid > > > > > > Systemd output: > > > > > > Dec 03 09:47:10 lb01-b.pictura-hosting.nl systemd[1]: haproxy.service: > > > Control > > > process exited, code=exited, status=1/FAILURE > > > ░░ Subject: Unit process exited > > > ░░ Defined-By: systemd > > > ░░ Support: https://www.debian.org/support > > > <https://www.debian.org/support> https://www.debian.org/support%3E > > > ░░ > > > ░░ An ExecReload= process belonging to unit haproxy.service has exited. > > > ░░ > > > ░░ The process' exit code is 'exited' and its exit status is 1. > > > Dec 03 09:47:10 lb01-b.pictura-hosting.nl systemd[1]: Reload failed for > > > haproxy.service - HAProxy Load Balancer. > > > ░░ Subject: A reload job for unit haproxy.service has finished > > > ░░ Defined-By: systemd > > > ░░ Support: https://www.debian.org/support > > > <https://www.debian.org/support> https://www.debian.org/support%3E > > > ░░ > > > ░░ A reload job for unit haproxy.service has finished. > > > ░░ > > > ░░ The job identifier is 3334 and the job result is failed. > > > > > > ● haproxy.service - HAProxy Load Balancer > > > Loaded: loaded (/etc/systemd/system/haproxy.service; enabled; > > > preset: enabled) > > > Active: active (running) since Mon 2024-12-02 15:50:00 CET; 18h ago > > > Docs: man:haproxy(1) > > > file:/usr/share/doc/haproxy/configuration.txt.gz > > > Process: 146648 ExecReload=/usr/sbin/haproxy -f $CONFIG -c -q > > > $EXTRAOPTS > > > (code=exited, status=1/FAILURE) > > > Main PID: 3963 (haproxy) > > > Status: "Ready." > > > Tasks: 5 (limit: 9513) > > > Memory: 207.2M > > > CPU: 41min 53.364s > > > CGroup: /system.slice/haproxy.service > > > <http://system.slice/haproxy.service> > > > http://system.slice/haproxy.service%3E > > > ├─ 3963 /usr/sbin/haproxy -Ws -f /etc/haproxy/conf.d -p > > > /run/ > > > haproxy.pid -S /run/haproxy-master.sock > > > └─98679 /usr/sbin/haproxy -sf 3994 -x sockpair@5 -Ws -f > > > /etc/ > > > haproxy/conf.d -p /run/haproxy.pid -S /run/haproxy-master.sock > > > > > > [some lines redacted] > > > Dec 03 09:47:10 lb01-b.pictura-hosting.nl systemd[1]: Reloading > > > haproxy.service > > > - HAProxy Load Balancer... > > > Dec 03 09:47:10 lb01-b.pictura-hosting.nl systemd[1]: haproxy.service: > > > Control > > > process exited, code=exited, status=1/FAILURE > > > Dec 03 09:47:10 lb01-b.pictura-hosting.nl systemd[1]: Reload failed for > > > haproxy.service - HAProxy Load Balancer. > > > > > > If any more info is needed or if I can do anything please let me know. > > > > > As the master-worker stuff was heavily rewritten in 3.1 can you try to stop > > and > > start HAP instead of a reload? > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Sander > > > > > Regards > > Alex > > >
