I would suggest using RADIUS as a dedicated proxy config/Proxy <https://wiki.freeradius.org/config/Proxy>
as for HAProxy Enterprise edition, here's open source mailing list. probably, you should reach HAProxy Enterprise sales and talk to them. пт, 3 янв. 2025 г. в 19:24, Shehan Jayawardane <sheh...@nvision.lk>: > Hi Aleksandar, > > Thanks for the information. > We have gone through what you have shared. And yes, with HAproxy it is not > possible. But is it the same for HAproxy enterprise edition? Can't we load > balance Radius traffic? > > > Best Regards, > Shehan Jayawardane > *Head of Engineering* > *sheh...@nvision.lk <sheh...@nvision.lk>* > www.thryvz.com > > > ------------------------------ > *From:* Aleksandar Lazic <al-hapr...@none.at> > *Sent:* 02 January 2025 18:05 > *To:* Shehan Jayawardane <sheh...@nvision.lk> > *Cc:* Willy Tarreau <w...@1wt.eu>; Joshua Turnbull <jos...@loadbalancer.org>; > haproxy@formilux.org <haproxy@formilux.org>; Dev Ops <dev...@nvision.lk>; > Sathiska Udayanga <sathi...@nvision.lk>; Tharka Karunanayake < > thar...@nvision.lk> > *Subject:* Re: HAproxy load balancing query > > Hi Shehan. > > On 2025-01-02 (Do.) 13:13, Shehan Jayawardane wrote: > > Hi Willy, > > > > Thanks for the information. > > Actually, our UDP traffic are radius requests to be forwarded to 1812, > and 1813 > > UDP ports. we need to load balance these requests. Can we load balance > these UDP > > requests? > > Looks like you have not read the GH thread which was suggested from Willy. > > https://github.com/haproxy/haproxy/issues/62 > > Cite from the last comment. > > ... For radius, since we're not using it, it's unlikely to appear any > time > soon. ... > > Please be so kind and read the answers and follow the links which are > suggested > from the responded E-Mail. > > In Short: No, HAProxy can't be used to LB Radius! > > Regards > Alex > > > Best Regards, > > Shehan Jayawardane > > *Head of Engineering* > > _shehanj@nvision.lk_ > > www.thryvz.com <http://www.thryvz.com/> > > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > *From:* Willy Tarreau <w...@1wt.eu> > > *Sent:* 02 January 2025 17:27 > > *To:* Shehan Jayawardane <sheh...@nvision.lk> > > *Cc:* Joshua Turnbull <jos...@loadbalancer.org>; haproxy@formilux.org > > <haproxy@formilux.org>; Dev Ops <dev...@nvision.lk>; Sathiska Udayanga > > <sathi...@nvision.lk> > > *Subject:* Re: HAproxy load balancing query > > Hi Shehan, > > > > On Thu, Jan 02, 2025 at 11:25:25AM +0000, Shehan Jayawardane wrote: > >> Hi Willy, > >> > >> Good day to you. > >> After long time I'm requesting this query as well. > >> with HA proxy are we able to load balance udp traffic? > > > > There isn't such a thing as "udp traffic" but there are udp-based > services > > and that makes a huge difference. Haproxy supports load-balancing syslog > > messages that it can receive over udp/tcp and send to udp/tcp, possibly > > even completing them (e.g. prepend the source address). > > > > For the rest, you'll almost always need service-specific handling since > > some services are message-based, others connection-based, uni- or bi- > > directional. Most services depend on the source address being joinable > > by the server, or may alter the behavior based on the source IP address > > (e.g. syslog, dns if using zones/geoip). There are already a number of > > dedicated proxies for various UDP-based services, which will always do > > the job better than a generic proxy. For example, for syslog, a tool > > such as rsyslog will be able to use the RELP protocol for reliable > > delivery and even to queue messages to avoid losses. For DNS there's > > dnsdist etc. > > > > For completeness, there's a module dealing with all these particularities > > in as much a generic way as possible in the haproxy enterprise packages, > > and I'm personally glad I don't have to maintain that because it's very > > far away from haproxy's scope. > > > > For more details and background on all of this, and some of the technical > > challenges, I invite you to read the discussion in this issue: > > > > https://github.com/haproxy/haproxy/issues/62 < > https://github.com/haproxy/ > > haproxy/issues/62> > > > > Hoping this helps, > > Willy > >
