On Fri, Nov 21, 2025 at 12:46:11PM +0100, Aleksandar Lazic wrote: > Subject: Re: Some questions about ACME challenge dns-01 > Hi William. > > On 2025-11-21 (Fr.) 12:37, William Lallemand wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 21, 2025 at 11:05:11AM +0100, Aleksandar Lazic wrote: > > > Subject: Re: Some questions about ACME challenge dns-01 > > > > > > Seems like a bug to me, since there are 2 domains it generated 2 > > > > > > challenges to > > > > > > set but your wildcard has the same base as the 2nd domain so > > > > > > there's a > > > > > > problem. I'll take a look. > > > > > > > > > > > > The task seems stuck waiting for every challenge_ready. I think > > > > > > I'll add more > > > > > > states in the `acme status` command so we can debug this more > > > > > > easily. > > > > > > > > > I just pushed a fix in master, you will have to set the 2 TXT entries with > > the same domain name like explained in the > > logs. But using `acme challenge_ready` will set every domain with the same > > name ready. > > Thanks. Have pulled and compiled. > > Sorry I do not understand what you mean with 2 TXT records. > > This one is set, which further TXT record do I need? > ``` > # dig @ns1.desec.io +short _acme-challenge.none.at txt > "uInm4ilCxq2ghvKYlu2GQTjFvs3cg5UaQM8l_0azSjA" > ``` >
When using the debug mode or the traces, you are polluted by too much output, it's difficult to see them. There's 2 logs about a TXT record in your logs. You need to use the 2 of them. -- William Lallemand
