The last I'd used was FoxPro 2.6 for DOS. I guess I don't know enough to contrast. It'd be great if you could elaborate a little on it.
Best Regards, Jasim. On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 12:18 AM, Roberto Lopez <[email protected]> wrote: > Jasim A Basheer wrote: > >> Robert, IMHO Clipper also was more in the object based spirit and its >> object orientation was not at all a drastic change. The learning curve >> was pretty small and programmers used to the old procedural style >> could easily adopt to the object notations. > > I personally believe that FoxPro evolution path was, by far, much more > inline with the original xBase philosophy. > > I've prefered that Clipper evolve in such way too. > > Regards, > > Roberto. > _______________________________________________ > Harbour-users mailing list (attachment size limit: 40KB) > [email protected] > http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour-users > _______________________________________________ Harbour-users mailing list (attachment size limit: 40KB) [email protected] http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour-users
