Victor

<----------------->
cOldGT := hb_gtSelect( "GTWIN" )
DispOutAt( 10, 10, "hello1" )
DispOutAt( 11, 10, "hello2" )
...
hb_gtSelect( "GTWVG" )
DispOutAt( 10, 10, "hello3" )
DispOutAt( 11, 10, "hello4" )
...
hb_gtSelect( cOldGT )
<----------------->

Perhaps you are viewing multi-GT from another angle.

It is MULTI-WINDOW SINGLE-GT approach, if I am not missing something, which has real-life usage. In an application there is never a need to open two TYPES of WINDOWS but windows performing two TYPES of TASKS. The real need is how those windows respond to events. For an example, one may need a window for punching an invoice and another window displaying, in scrolling mode,
catalogs or another information. If we take above approach, then
output/input only occurs in the window we have selected as hb_gtSelect( pGT == nWindow /*"GTWVG"*/ ). What happens, in the middle of execution of a
piece of code, user clicks on another window executing another code.

I am of the opinion that current api must not be changed at command syntax but must be extended to support multi-windows. On compiler level what needs to be changed has to be changed just like what Przemek has done with the
core GT.

I am not sure enough to what extent I am been able to explain my viewpoint.
Please take this as a quick, brief explanation.

Okey, I see what you mean, but my opinion is still the same regarding
window selection. Window selection should be a separate command IMO.

We're not extending (which essentially means changing) existing CA- Cl*pper
functions as a rule in Harbour.

nOldWnd := hb_gtwvg_WSelect( nDetails )
DispOut(...)
hb_gtwvg_WSelect( nMyOtherWindow )
DispOut(...)
hb_gtwvg_WSelect( nOldWnd )

Since apps are usually using one window at a time, switching
between them this way is not a performance or coding problem.

As an alternative, you can also implement such thing locally
for your GT:

hb_gtwvg_DispOut( nMyWindow, "hello" )

Brgds,
Viktor

_______________________________________________
Harbour mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour

Reply via email to