Hi David, On 2008.02.11., at 2:07, David Arturo Macias Corona wrote:
>This is true for make_*os2.cmd, bld.cmd, etc. If these >were updated by the OS/2 users here (David?), I think >they're okey, once we've agreed on the filenames. If they need changes, I can do it >I'd suggest /make_gnu_os2.cmd which is uglier, but >clearer IMO, since it also suggest we're talking about >the GNU make system, not something fully separate OS/2 >stuff. Long filenames, we already have. >For the other batch file: /bin/bld_os2.cmd Older make_gnu.cmd, bld.cmd filenames are enough
One of the reasons I removed these is to avoid any confusion for Windows users, to decide which batch file to run. I think it's very important to have clear filenames and the least redundancy. '.cmd' for a Windows user means a native batch file, so this extension by itself, is _ambiguous_. That's why we should include "os2" to clear that up. Brgds, Viktor _______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list [email protected] http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
