On Fri, 29 Feb 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi ppl,
> With ADS, if the double field have large values like 1234567890123,
> harbour displays ******** instead a value.
> If I use str(field,20) the value is displayed correct.
Not only double. In ADS* RDDs non of numeric binary field sizes is
translated to valid size for decimal representation, f.e. the same
is for short ("I"/"short",2,0) and integer ("I"/"integer",4,0) when
the decimal representation will be bigger then 2 or 4 digits.
In each numeric item we keep default size for str() formating and
ADS RDDs sets this size to binary field size instead of maximum size
for binary representation. AFAIR this problems exists from the beginning.
It's only formatting problem when you do not explicitly set the size
but if you want to fix it then you should set valid size in adsGetValue()
function. It will be few lines only. You can take maximum sizes for all
types from dbf1.c or other RDDs I was working on (f.e. s_uiNumLength
translation table in delim1.c can be used for all integer sizes in
range 1,8)
Best regards,
Przemek
_______________________________________________
Harbour mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
