On Wed, 30 Apr 2008, Szakáts Viktor wrote: Hi Viktor,
> What is your opinion to use the same filenames > as in the original package? > This would help updating a great deal, since now > it takes two renaming sessions, and several other > modification and diffing passes. > I guess it comes down to how important is it to > support this library for DOS builds.. Yes, it's for DOS builds. For some compilers which can support long filenames like DJGPP as workaround it will be possible to create binaries on platforms which supports long filenames but it will not work for all compilers. Anyhow if it will reduce modifications in PCRE then I think it will be reasonable. But now I'm afraid that PCRE still needs additional modification for C++ compilers and some warnings cleanups so this seems to be minor part of job. best regards, Przemek ps. I'll be offline until Sunday. _______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list [email protected] http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
