Wich kind of makefile is in Utils\hbdoc\makefile?
Will this structure be used as make_file instead old hbmake?
#
# $Id: Makefile 8377 2008-04-24 19:26:54Z vszakats $
#
ifeq ($(HB_MAIN),)
HB_MAIN = std
endif
ROOT = ../../
PRG_SOURCES=\
hbdoc.prg \
genos2.prg \
gentrf.prg \
genng.prg \
genhtm.prg \
genchm.prg \
genrtf.prg \
genhpc.prg \
genasc.prg \
genpdf1.prg \
teeasc.prg \
html.prg \
ng.prg \
os2.prg \
rtf.prg \
troff.prg \
fclass1.prg \
ffile1.prg \
ft_funcs.prg \
PRG_MAIN=hbdoc.prg
LIBS=\
hbdebug \
hbvm \
hbrtl \
hbrdd \
hbrtl \
hbvm \
hbmacro \
hbpp \
hblang \
hbcommon \
include $(TOP)$(ROOT)config/bin.cf
-----Original Message-----
hbmake was created with such goal, 9 years ago, you can
see where it stands now. I personally think the basic goal
of hbmake is wrong. In any case we'd need active _developers_
and a clear vision for such a tool (any tool). I personally
cannot contribute in either areas regarding hbmake. If
there are any takers _now_, good, otherwise I'd vote to
move hbmake to contrib/examples/.
As an aside, I myself have some make problems locally,
...still using rmake, which is choking on GCC, and
on large projects in general. So, I think it would be a
true-to-the-goal and useful idea to implement an rmake
compatible, but portable tool in Harbour. Notice the goal
is completely different from the current hbmake. This also
needs takers though, and there is the thing that several
make packages exist even on the OSS scene, so some may
consider it a duplicate effort.
Brgds,
Viktor
_______________________________________________
Harbour mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
_______________________________________________
Harbour mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
