Hi Massimo,
For ref:
[ robodoc is the other tool ]
Begin forwarded message:
From: Szakáts Viktor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 2007. november 23. 21:31:46 GMT+01:00
To: "Harbour Project Main Developer List." <[email protected]
>
Subject: hbdoc / hbmake
Hi all,
I'd like to get some opinions on hbmake / hbdoc.
Both seems to be pretty bug ridden and not well
maintained (seems so even after refreshing to the
latest xhb version).
IMO hbmake should somehow be "refactored" to reach
a certain level of quality.
hbdoc on the other hand could be replaced by some
standard doc generating tool, so that we don't have
to deal with the development of the tool itself.
Some possible (free, GPL) alternatives:
robodoc (HTML, DocBook, TXT, LaTeX, PDF, RTF outputs)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ROBODoc
http://www.xs4all.nl/~rfsber/Robo/robodoc.html
doxygen (HTML, LaTeX, man, RTF, XML, CHM, PS, PDF)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doxygen
http://www.doxygene.org/
robodoc would need less reformatting of our current
docs, doxygen has a wider output support, but both are
able to produce most modern doc type outputs, see the
links for more.
Opinions (and contributors) are welcome.
Brgds,
Viktor
_______________________________________________
Harbour mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
