Hi Toninho,
To compile hbziparch, you may try using -D_USE_OLDER_RW_STL
(in C_USR) as a workaround. Pls tell us your results.
(in BCC 5.82 it fails due to missing Borland includes.)
In BCC 5.9 fails too. None is changed.
I see you try to switch to hbmzip, which is the best solution,
despite all the cleaning effort I may just simply delete
hbziparch pretty soon to not cause any more headaches for
everyone.
Viktor, my first impressions about hbmzip is so good, my tests here
indicates high speed compared to hbziparch and the conversion is so
easy.
Good news. I'm also a happy user of hbmzip.
I´m writing two function to help hbziparch users to move to hbmzip
easily, but it is not finished yet:
That's very nice for those wanting to transition.
(just a small note: the dir change to C:\ looks a bit
dangerous to me)
Brgds,
Viktor
_______________________________________________
Harbour mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
