Hi Viktor,
Il 12/02/2009 19.17, Viktor Szakáts ha scritto:
We can even have these in parallel, and if we go this route,
we should gather all these <dialect>_*() dialect prefixed
functions in separate files (for clarity and future development),
and user can easily map the one they need using
"FUNC TTOS( x ) ; RETURN *_TTOS( x )" [ or with null
overhead in C ], or even use them in parallel. Later we can
move these dialect dependent implementations into separate
libs, which would allow to use the original names, of course
in this case collision may occur if someone links multiple
one with such colliding names, but I don't this is a problem
in practice.
This will open an interesting discussion on a possible namespace
implementation, like Ron did in xharbour (but I never tried it and I
don't know any implementation detail), that I think will be useful in
some cases.
Obviously this is a future request possibly for harbour 2.0 ;-)
But I begin to thought to this thinking if it possible to create a
*small* php wrapper to use in uHTTPD server (only an idea, I don't think
to any implementation detail) where I can take a php source and paste
it in a hrb module, but using activating a namespace functionality to
redirect any function to a PHP_*() internal functions and have no
collision with harbour/clipper namespace.
Just a thought.
Best regards,
Francesco
_______________________________________________
Harbour mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
