Another posting of Steffen that reply to xbase is the only multitread project
require a reply? Steffen's Response to my post on Pritpal Bedi take on Multi- threading. Sorry to use your blog to comment on the comments of others, as I think this is not the idea of a blog. Anyway please allow me to clarify my statement. I said "clean and easy to use way of multithreading", i didn't say the Harbours don't support Multithreading. My statement is still true, even so Harbour and xHarbour have implemented the ability to execute code in multiple threads and have implemented some of the interfaces Xbase++ provides in one way or another. They are still far away from the idea and concepts of Xbase++ in that area. In addition Harbour and xHarbour implemented different semantics of isolation. Which makes porting of complex MT applications for sure a mess. Let me clarify that. 2009/2/18 Massimo Belgrano <[email protected]>: > From a user's POV they are probably the same. > > Maybe there are some aspects of xhb which I don't know and could make > the process different, but normally it's just a recompile and relink, > feature-wise Harbour is on par with xhb, and a plus Harbour is > cleaner, more robust, more portable and faster, it also has an xhb.lib > which aims to provide compatibility with features we've opted not to > include in the core product... > > Read the rest of this most interesting and helpful article at > Clipper... Clipper... Clipper at http://cch4clipper.blogspot.com. > > CCH > Clipper... Clipper... Clipper > http://cch4clipper.blogspot.com. > -- Massimo Belgrano Albo Nazionale Informatici Professionisti 2620 Socio 2843 Associazione Informatici prof. Analisi e sviluppo software per Lan e Web Consulenza informatica - Formazione Delta Informatica S.r.l. http://www.deltain.it Via Torelli,31 - 28100 Novara - Tel: 0321/30281 _______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list [email protected] http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
