Hi I retreat my findings.
Dlmalloc.c does not increase the size of the memory but memProof.exe reports unfreed blocks for sure. -WIN_ALLOC does not report any unfree blocks. Regards Pritpal Bedi Francesco Saverio Giudice wrote: > > Hi Pritpal, > at first look it seems that with -DHB_FM_WIN_ALLOC is better, but the > problem is still there. > > I've only a doubt: do I set correctly my env ? I have added: > set HB_USER_CFLAGS=-DHB_LEGACY_OFF -DHB_FM_STATISTICS_OFF > -DHB_FM_WIN_ALLOC > > I think yes. > So I have to continue to investigate. Now I will try to reduce to a > simple application. > > Best regards, > Francesco > > Il 23/02/2009 21.01, Francesco Saverio Giudice ha scritto: >> Hi Pritpal, >> >> Il 23/02/2009 20.45, Pritpal Bedi ha scritto: >>> This also shed light on uhttpd's reported high memory consumption in >>> another thread. Francesco ? >> >> Just testing >> > > _______________________________________________ > Harbour mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Dlmalloc.c---VirtualAlloc-Free---Test-Results-tp22143106p22173402.html Sent from the Harbour - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list [email protected] http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
