Understand. But my vote is to call the HARBOUR.EXE , since I can update it and not want to change the version of my hbmk2.exe (perhaps by BUG or even a different implementation that I will do it) and in these cases that may interfere.
2009/2/24 Viktor Szakáts <[email protected]>: > Hi all, > >> >> * utils/hbmk2/hbmk2.prg >> + Added -DHBMK_INTEGRATED_COMPILER compile time option >> to enable integrated Harbour compiler. Experimental, >> please test. This results is bigger executable (obviously) >> but may be more efficient on some platforms. > > BTW, any opinions on that? > Would it have benefits? downsides? > Shall we make it the default, or a command line option? > Brgds, > Viktor > > _______________________________________________ > Harbour mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour > > -- Vailton Renato SQL LIB, MyMake & xDev Developer _______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list [email protected] http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
